The vaccine controversies adhere to a particular sequence, making it tough to restructure the public’s trust in the vaccine. Primarily, a hypothesis concerning the negative health effect of a vaccine is established, restricting the initial research on the vaccine. Ultimately, the public’s assurance of the vaccine is conceded and may take years to recreate. This is an enormous health problem since it surges people’s vulnerability to the related illnesses along with significant fiscal losses in the vaccine businesses. For example, Doctor Andrew Wakefield’s disputed the contention that the MMR vaccine instigates autism; this resulted in many inconsistencies and deficits and was labeled as the most disparaging medical paradox for the past 100 years (Dixon & Clarke, 2013).
Even though vaccines are likely to cause various health effects, the effects are extremely rare and make it tough for experts to regulate their grounds. Nevertheless, for the immunization programs to be efficient, the public’s trust is vital. Numerous pieces of evidence have established that vaccines inhibitions have resulted in an ending of numerous sorrows and deaths triggered by infectious illnesses compared to the number of hostile effects it has produced. Consequently, comprehending the health risks caused by failing to vaccinate (Flaherty, 2011).
Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358-382.
Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302-1304.